On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:20:11AM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without
On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:20:11AM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05
From: Bryan Freed
When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05 command
as this appears to occasionally put the TPM in a bad
From: Bryan Freed
When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05 command
as this appears to occasionally put the TPM in a bad state.
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:24:31PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
> >
> > Peter, Andrew, anyone: Tested-by?
>
> Sorry, i don't have the hardware. All i can give you is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
>
> Andrew
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 03:24:31PM +0200, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
> >
> > Peter, Andrew, anyone: Tested-by?
>
> Sorry, i don't have the hardware. All i can give you is:
>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
>
> Andrew
Thank you.
/Jarkko
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:05:32PM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
>
>
> Am 5. April 2017 11:03:27 MESZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen
> :
> >On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> >> From: Bryan Freed
> >>
> >> When
On Wed, Apr 05, 2017 at 12:05:32PM +0200, Peter Huewe wrote:
>
>
> Am 5. April 2017 11:03:27 MESZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen
> :
> >On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> >> From: Bryan Freed
> >>
> >> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
>
> Peter, Andrew, anyone: Tested-by?
Sorry, i don't have the hardware. All i can give you is:
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
Andrew
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen
>
> Peter, Andrew, anyone: Tested-by?
Sorry, i don't have the hardware. All i can give you is:
Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn
Andrew
Am 5. April 2017 11:03:27 MESZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen
:
>On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> From: Bryan Freed
>>
>> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
>> a size
Am 5. April 2017 11:03:27 MESZ schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen
:
>On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
>> From: Bryan Freed
>>
>> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
>> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP.
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 05:29:38PM +0200, Enric Balletbo i Serra wrote:
> From: Bryan Freed
>
> When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
> a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
> them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05
From: Bryan Freed
When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05 command
as this appears to occasionally put the TPM in a bad
From: Bryan Freed
When the I2C Infineon part is attached to an I2C adapter that imposes
a size limitation, large requests will fail with -EOPNOTSUPP. Retry
them with a sane minimum size without re-issuing the 0x05 command
as this appears to occasionally put the TPM in a bad state.
20 matches
Mail list logo