On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 6:55 AM, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:50:47 -0700
> Michel Lespinasse wrote:
>
>> This is IMO where the spin_unlock_wait(&sma->sem_perm.lock) would
>> belong - right before the goto again.
>
> Here is the slightly more optimistic (and probably more readable
On Thu, 28 Mar 2013 19:50:47 -0700
Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> This is IMO where the spin_unlock_wait(&sma->sem_perm.lock) would
> belong - right before the goto again.
Here is the slightly more optimistic (and probably more readable)
version of the patch:
---8<---
Unfortunately the locking sche
2 matches
Mail list logo