Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Hugetlbfs support for riscv

On 7/4/19 7:35 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: On 7/4/19 12:57 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: - libhugetlbfs testsuite on riscv64/2M: - brk_near_huge triggers an assert in malloc.c, does not on x86. I was able

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Hugetlbfs support for riscv

On Thu, 4 Jul 2019, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > On 7/4/19 12:57 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > > > > > - libhugetlbfs testsuite on riscv64/2M: > > >- brk_near_huge triggers an assert in malloc.c, does not on x86. > > I was able to reproduce the 2MB

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Hugetlbfs support for riscv

On 7/4/19 12:57 AM, Paul Walmsley wrote: Hi Alex, Thanks for writing and testing these patches, and thanks for your patience waiting for reviews and testing. No problem :) On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: This series introduces hugetlbfs support for both riscv 32/64. Riscv32

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Hugetlbfs support for riscv

On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 01:58:58PM -0400, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > - icache-hygiene succeeds after patch #3 of this series which lowers > > the base address of mmap. > I think іcache-hygiene will also need a call to

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Hugetlbfs support for riscv

Hi Alex, Thanks for writing and testing these patches, and thanks for your patience waiting for reviews and testing. On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, Alexandre Ghiti wrote: > This series introduces hugetlbfs support for both riscv 32/64. Riscv32 > > is architecturally limited to huge pages of

[PATCH v3 0/2] Hugetlbfs support for riscv

This series introduces hugetlbfs support for both riscv 32/64. Riscv32 is architecturally limited to huge pages of size 4MB whereas riscv64 has 2MB/1G huge pages support. Transparent huge page support is not implemented here, I will submit another series