Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Update mce_record tracepoint

2024-03-25 Thread Naik, Avadhut
On 3/25/2024 15:31, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:12:14PM -0500, Naik, Avadhut wrote: >> Can this patchset be merged in? Or would you prefer me sending out >> another revision with Steven's "Reviewed-by:" tag? > > First of all, please do not top-post. > Apologies for

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Update mce_record tracepoint

2024-03-25 Thread Borislav Petkov
On Mon, Mar 25, 2024 at 03:12:14PM -0500, Naik, Avadhut wrote: > Can this patchset be merged in? Or would you prefer me sending out > another revision with Steven's "Reviewed-by:" tag? First of all, please do not top-post. Then, you were on Cc on the previous thread. Please summarize from it and

[PATCH v3 0/2] Update mce_record tracepoint

2024-03-25 Thread Naik, Avadhut
Hi Boris, Can this patchset be merged in? Or would you prefer me sending out another revision with Steven's "Reviewed-by:" tag? On 2/8/2024 11:10, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:57:58 -0600 > Avadhut Naik wrote: > >> This patchset updates the mce_record tracepoint so that the

Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Update mce_record tracepoint

2024-02-08 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Fri, 26 Jan 2024 01:57:58 -0600 Avadhut Naik wrote: > This patchset updates the mce_record tracepoint so that the recently added > fields of struct mce are exported through it to userspace. > > The first patch adds PPIN (Protected Processor Inventory Number) field to > the tracepoint. > >

[PATCH v3 0/2] Update mce_record tracepoint

2024-01-26 Thread Avadhut Naik
This patchset updates the mce_record tracepoint so that the recently added fields of struct mce are exported through it to userspace. The first patch adds PPIN (Protected Processor Inventory Number) field to the tracepoint. The second patch adds the microcode field (Microcode Revision) to the