On Mon, Oct 21, 2013 at 12:18 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Autobuild was unfortunately not too happy with one of the patches,
> sorry about that. I have sent a small series that addresses the issues
> it highlighted. Not sure if you are ok with squashing the first two
> into bae48da2, but IMHO
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Linus Walleij
>> wrote:
>
>>> We might have to take this as the first thing after the merge
>>> window and targeted for v3.14.
>>
>> No particula
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 7:37 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
>> We might have to take this as the first thing after the merge
>> window and targeted for v3.14.
>
> No particular pressure from my side to get this in 3.13. Do for the
> best,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Alexandre Courbot
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> This version should merge as-is in your tree (I hope!). A patch for
>> documentation will follow soon.
>>
>> Changes since v2:
>> - rebased on top of Linus' fo
On Thu, Oct 17, 2013 at 7:21 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> This version should merge as-is in your tree (I hope!). A patch for
> documentation will follow soon.
>
> Changes since v2:
> - rebased on top of Linus' for-next branch
> - exported new gpiod_(un)lock_as_irq() functions in
Hi Linus,
This version should merge as-is in your tree (I hope!). A patch for
documentation will follow soon.
Changes since v2:
- rebased on top of Linus' for-next branch
- exported new gpiod_(un)lock_as_irq() functions in driver.h
- squashed a fix for a compilation error
Alexandre Courbot (3):
6 matches
Mail list logo