On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 12:05:57PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 04:49:26PM +0800, Michalis Pappas wrote:
> > Hi Dan, thanks for looking at this. From the above snippet I realize
> > that I wasn't aware of the strict flag, so significantly less errors
> > were produced.
> >
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 04:49:26PM +0800, Michalis Pappas wrote:
> Hi Dan, thanks for looking at this. From the above snippet I realize
> that I wasn't aware of the strict flag, so significantly less errors
> were produced.
>
> The issues I was referring to as pedantic are:
>
> WARNING: unchecked
On 04/23/2014 04:04 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:39:06AM +0800, Michalis Pappas wrote:
>> After all patches have been applied, the only remaining issue on the
>> TODO list is to conform to the coding standards. The remaining issues
>> reported by checkpatch.pl are probably
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:39:06AM +0800, Michalis Pappas wrote:
> After all patches have been applied, the only remaining issue on the
> TODO list is to conform to the coding standards. The remaining issues
> reported by checkpatch.pl are probably pedantic, so if agreed, that
> task can be remove
The following patches perform various cleanups on the gdm72xx driver.
PATCH 1/3 fixes some small coding style issues
PATCH 2/3 removes an already completed item from the TODO list
PATCH 3/3 replaces some jiffies comparisons with wrap-safe functions
After all patches have been applied, the only re
5 matches
Mail list logo