On 02/08/15 04:09, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 05/02/15 17:05, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> On 05/02/15 00:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 01/30, Daniel Thompson wrote:
This patchset optimizes the generic sched_clock implementation to
significantly reduce the data cache profile. It also makes
On 05/02/15 17:05, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> On 05/02/15 00:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 01/30, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>>> This patchset optimizes the generic sched_clock implementation to
>>> significantly reduce the data cache profile. It also makes it safe to call
>>> sched_clock() from NMI (or
On 05/02/15 00:50, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 01/30, Daniel Thompson wrote:
>> This patchset optimizes the generic sched_clock implementation to
>> significantly reduce the data cache profile. It also makes it safe to call
>> sched_clock() from NMI (or FIQ on ARM).
>>
>> The data cache profile of sch
On 01/30, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> This patchset optimizes the generic sched_clock implementation to
> significantly reduce the data cache profile. It also makes it safe to call
> sched_clock() from NMI (or FIQ on ARM).
>
> The data cache profile of sched_clock() in both the original code and
> my
This patchset optimizes the generic sched_clock implementation to
significantly reduce the data cache profile. It also makes it safe to call
sched_clock() from NMI (or FIQ on ARM).
The data cache profile of sched_clock() in both the original code and
my previous patch was somewhere between 2 and 3
5 matches
Mail list logo
