Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power

2016-01-06 Thread Javi Merino
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 11:21:54AM +, Daniel Thompson wrote: > On 06/01/16 10:07, Javi Merino wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:53:44PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > >>k_po/k_pu are two proportional term constants and essentially they have > >>fixed ratio compared with sustainable power. In curren

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power

2016-01-06 Thread Daniel Thompson
On 06/01/16 10:07, Javi Merino wrote: On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:53:44PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: k_po/k_pu are two proportional term constants and essentially they have fixed ratio compared with sustainable power. In current implementation, k_po and k_pu are absolute value after calculation and ca

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power

2016-01-06 Thread Leo Yan
Hi Javi, On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 10:07:13AM +, Javi Merino wrote: > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:53:44PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > > k_po/k_pu are two proportional term constants and essentially they have > > fixed ratio compared with sustainable power. In current implementation, > > k_po and k_pu

Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power

2016-01-06 Thread Javi Merino
On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:53:44PM +0800, Leo Yan wrote: > k_po/k_pu are two proportional term constants and essentially they have > fixed ratio compared with sustainable power. In current implementation, > k_po and k_pu are absolute value after calculation and cannot represent > the ratio relation

[PATCH v3 0/4] thermal: re-calculate k_po/k_pu when update sustainable power

2016-01-06 Thread Leo Yan
k_po/k_pu are two proportional term constants and essentially they have fixed ratio compared with sustainable power. In current implementation, k_po and k_pu are absolute value after calculation and cannot represent the ratio relationship with sustainable power; as a result, when change sustainable