On 02/09/2015 12:31, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> As far as I can see this should also work for s390 (when we implement
> REQ_EXIT handling)
>
> To double check my understanding: these improvements come with a changed
> userspace that does not use KVM_SET_SIGNAL_MASK and therefore this
> cond
Am 14.08.2015 um 12:08 schrieb Radim Krčmář:
> v3:
> * acked by Christian [1/5]
> * use ioctl argument directly (unsigned long as flags) [4/5]
> * precisely #ifdef arch-specific ioctls [5/5]
> v2:
> * move request_exits debug counter patch right after introduction of
>KVM_REQ_EXIT [3/5]
>
On 14/08/2015 12:08, Radim Krčmář wrote:
> v3:
> * acked by Christian [1/5]
> * use ioctl argument directly (unsigned long as flags) [4/5]
> * precisely #ifdef arch-specific ioctls [5/5]
> v2:
> * move request_exits debug counter patch right after introduction of
>KVM_REQ_EXIT [3/5]
> *
v3:
* acked by Christian [1/5]
* use ioctl argument directly (unsigned long as flags) [4/5]
* precisely #ifdef arch-specific ioctls [5/5]
v2:
* move request_exits debug counter patch right after introduction of
KVM_REQ_EXIT [3/5]
* use vcpu ioctl instead of vm one [4/5]
* shrink kvm_user_e
4 matches
Mail list logo