Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] LMU Common code intro

2019-05-07 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 01 May 2019, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > Ekhm, I forgot to add the main recipient. > > Adding Lee. > > On 5/1/19 12:05 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: > > Hi Lee, > > > > This patch set has dependency on the previous one for lm3532, which > > also touches ti-lmu.txt bindings, and for which I

Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] LMU Common code intro

2019-05-01 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
Ekhm, I forgot to add the main recipient. Adding Lee. On 5/1/19 12:05 AM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: Hi Lee, This patch set has dependency on the previous one for lm3532, which also touches ti-lmu.txt bindings, and for which I already created immutable branch. Now if I created another immutable b

Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] LMU Common code intro

2019-04-30 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
Hi Lee, This patch set has dependency on the previous one for lm3532, which also touches ti-lmu.txt bindings, and for which I already created immutable branch. Now if I created another immutable branch for this patch set we would have to resolve conflicts between the two, as they would both be ba

[PATCH v3 0/7] LMU Common code intro

2019-04-30 Thread Dan Murphy
Hello I have added the Reviewed-by for dt bindings as well as made the Kconfig change pointed out for the common code flag Dan Dan Murphy (7): dt-bindings: mfd: LMU: Fix lm3632 dt binding example dt-bindings: mfd: LMU: Add the ramp up/down property dt-bindings: mfd: LMU: Add ti,brightness-