On 05/06, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 20:22 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > This series introduces clk_div_mask() helper in one place instead of
> > div_mask() macros in many clock providers.
>
> This one is tested on x86 with patchset [1] applied.
>
> Any comments, suggesti
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 20:22 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This series introduces clk_div_mask() helper in one place instead of
> div_mask() macros in many clock providers.
This one is tested on x86 with patchset [1] applied.
Any comments, suggestions?
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/4/1/189
>
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 08:22:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> This series introduces clk_div_mask() helper in one place instead of
> div_mask() macros in many clock providers.
>
> Changelog v3:
> - fix clk_div_mask() prototype: seems tired like on Friday evening!
Yea, that's three versions
This series introduces clk_div_mask() helper in one place instead of div_mask()
macros in many clock providers.
Changelog v3:
- fix clk_div_mask() prototype: seems tired like on Friday evening!
Changelog v2:
- fix patches 5,6,7 where parameter of the macro was d instead of d->width
Andy Shevche
4 matches
Mail list logo
