On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:31:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> This whole mess is intended for x86/urgent. It fixes several bugs.
>
> It's probably a tiny performance regression on some workloads on
> Intel CPUs. It's probably varies between a less tiny regression and
> a small
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:31:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> This whole mess is intended for x86/urgent. It fixes several bugs.
>
> It's probably a tiny performance regression on some workloads on
> Intel CPUs. It's probably varies between a less tiny regression and
> a small
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:31:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> This whole mess is intended for x86/urgent. It fixes several bugs.
>
> It's probably a tiny performance regression on some workloads on
> Intel CPUs. It's probably varies between a less tiny regression and
> a small
On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 05:31:43PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Hi all-
>
> This whole mess is intended for x86/urgent. It fixes several bugs.
>
> It's probably a tiny performance regression on some workloads on
> Intel CPUs. It's probably varies between a less tiny regression and
> a small
Hi all-
This whole mess is intended for x86/urgent. It fixes several bugs.
It's probably a tiny performance regression on some workloads on
Intel CPUs. It's probably varies between a less tiny regression and
a small speedup on newer AMD CPUs. It's a bigger regression on AMD
K8.
The AMD code
Hi all-
This whole mess is intended for x86/urgent. It fixes several bugs.
It's probably a tiny performance regression on some workloads on
Intel CPUs. It's probably varies between a less tiny regression and
a small speedup on newer AMD CPUs. It's a bigger regression on AMD
K8.
The AMD code
6 matches
Mail list logo