Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] sta2x11-mfd patches

2012-11-19 Thread Mark Brown
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 07:44:23PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > I merged Mark's topic/lock branch into my for-next branch for that patchset to > build. Mark, are you fine with that ? Please never merge any branches of mine, only signed tags. I've just pushed up a tag for this (lock). signature

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] sta2x11-mfd patches

2012-11-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Davide, Mark, On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 06:58:58PM +0100, Samuel Ortiz wrote: > Hi Davide, > > On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:19:51PM +0100, cimina...@gnudd.com wrote: > > From: Davide Ciminaghi > > > > Hi, > > > > this is v3 of a patchset submitted on > > 2012/10/22 (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/

Re: [PATCH v3 00/10] sta2x11-mfd patches

2012-11-19 Thread Samuel Ortiz
Hi Davide, On Fri, Nov 09, 2012 at 03:19:51PM +0100, cimina...@gnudd.com wrote: > From: Davide Ciminaghi > > Hi, > > this is v3 of a patchset submitted on > 2012/10/22 (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/22/290) > and 2012/09/12 (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/12/139). > Here's a summary of ch

[PATCH v3 00/10] sta2x11-mfd patches

2012-11-09 Thread ciminaghi
From: Davide Ciminaghi Hi, this is v3 of a patchset submitted on 2012/10/22 (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/22/290) and 2012/09/12 (see https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/9/12/139). Here's a summary of changes in v3: * Regmap support fix: sta2x11_apb_soc_regs_writeable_reg() fixed as suggested by Ma