On 09/22/2012 12:46 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:11:54PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> This is a followup to the previous kmem series. I divided them logically
>> so it gets easier for reviewers. But I believe they are ready to be merged
>> together (although we ca
On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 01:46:19PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> In general, things look good to me. I think the basic approach is
> manageable and does a decent job of avoiding introducing complications
> on the usual code paths.
>
> Pekka seems generally happy with the approach too. Christoph, wha
Hello,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 06:11:54PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This is a followup to the previous kmem series. I divided them logically
> so it gets easier for reviewers. But I believe they are ready to be merged
> together (although we can do a two-pass merge if people would prefer)
>
>
On 09/21/2012 01:40 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> Hi Glauber,
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
>> This is a followup to the previous kmem series. I divided them logically
>> so it gets easier for reviewers. But I believe they are ready to be merged
>> together (although we ca
Hi Glauber,
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 5:11 PM, Glauber Costa wrote:
> This is a followup to the previous kmem series. I divided them logically
> so it gets easier for reviewers. But I believe they are ready to be merged
> together (although we can do a two-pass merge if people would prefer)
>
> Thr
This is a followup to the previous kmem series. I divided them logically
so it gets easier for reviewers. But I believe they are ready to be merged
together (although we can do a two-pass merge if people would prefer)
Throwaway git tree found at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/
6 matches
Mail list logo
