This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for
the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the
previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like
generic timer dts specification) but the main goal was to freeze the
user ABI.
The Linux kern
On Fri, 7 Sep 2012, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for
> the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the
> previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like
> generic timer dts specification) but the m
On 09/07/2012 12:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for
the 64-bit ARM architecture.
...but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI.
Is the consensus now that we're good from an ABI viewpoint?
Jon.
--
To unsubscribe from this
On Monday 10 September 2012, Jon Masters wrote:
> On 09/07/2012 12:26 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for
> > the 64-bit ARM architecture.
>
>
> > ...but the main goal was to freeze the user ABI.
>
> Is the consensus now that we
On Sat, Sep 08, 2012 at 12:25:37AM +0100, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:26:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for
> > the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the
> > previous release h
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:26:35PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for
> the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the
> previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like
> generic timer dts spe
Catalin,
On Friday 07 September 2012 09:56 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
This is the 3rd version of patches implementing Linux kernel support for
the 64-bit ARM architecture. Most of the review comments for the
previous release have been implemented. There are a few left (like
generic timer dts spe
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
> Mostly I was looking at the series from SOC boot and CPU PM
> point of view and boot part seems to just fine.
>
> As per discussion at LPC, I have gone through the SMC
> proposal which ARM has published. In general the boot part
> with SMC seems to b
On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012, Santosh Shilimkar wrote:
>
>> Mostly I was looking at the series from SOC boot and CPU PM
>> point of view and boot part seems to just fine.
>>
>> As per discussion at LPC, I have gone through the SMC
>> proposal which ARM
9 matches
Mail list logo