On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 21:09 +, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 22:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 21:09 +, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 22:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 22:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > > On Mon,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 12:09 AM, Koul, Vinod wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 22:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 22:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at
On Wed, 2016-04-06 at 22:56 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > >
>> > > + /*
>> > > + *
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:56 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > >
>> > > + /*
>> > > + * We need
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * We need controller-specific data to set up slave
> > > transfers.
> > > + */
>
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 08:10:54PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > > + /*
> > > + * We need controller-specific data to set up slave
> > > transfers.
> > > + */
>
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > + * We need controller-specific data to set up slave
> > transfers.
> > + */
> > + BUG_ON(chan->private && !dw_dma_filter(chan, chan-
> > >private));
On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 10:03 -0700, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > + /*
> > + * We need controller-specific data to set up slave
> > transfers.
> > + */
> > + BUG_ON(chan->private && !dw_dma_filter(chan, chan-
> > >private));
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> + /*
> + * We need controller-specific data to set up slave transfers.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(chan->private && !dw_dma_filter(chan, chan->private));
I don't think BUG_ON is apt here, gracefully failing and printing
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 04:24:40PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> + /*
> + * We need controller-specific data to set up slave transfers.
> + */
> + BUG_ON(chan->private && !dw_dma_filter(chan, chan->private));
I don't think BUG_ON is apt here, gracefully failing and printing
The commit 895005202987 ("dmaengine: dw: apply both HS interfaces and remove
slave_id usage") cleaned up the code to avoid usage of depricated slave_id
member of generic slave configuration.
Meanwhile it broke the master selection by removing important call to
dwc_set_masters() in
The commit 895005202987 ("dmaengine: dw: apply both HS interfaces and remove
slave_id usage") cleaned up the code to avoid usage of depricated slave_id
member of generic slave configuration.
Meanwhile it broke the master selection by removing important call to
dwc_set_masters() in
16 matches
Mail list logo