Fix coding style issues of block comments, reported by checkpatch.pl.
Besides, do some expression optimization for the sentenses.

Signed-off-by: Xiaofei Tan <tanxiao...@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c | 16 ++++++++++------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
index 86070f7..5b4ab16 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_jobctrl.c
@@ -204,8 +204,10 @@ int tty_signal_session_leader(struct tty_struct *tty, int 
exit_session)
                        spin_lock_irq(&p->sighand->siglock);
                        if (p->signal->tty == tty) {
                                p->signal->tty = NULL;
-                               /* We defer the dereferences outside fo
-                                  the tasklist lock */
+                               /*
+                                * We defer the dereferences outside of
+                                * the tasklist lock.
+                                */
                                refs++;
                        }
                        if (!p->signal->leader) {
@@ -328,9 +330,11 @@ void disassociate_ctty(int on_exit)
  */
 void no_tty(void)
 {
-       /* FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
-          between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possible we need
-          to protect against this anyway */
+       /*
+        * FIXME: Review locking here. The tty_lock never covered any race
+        * between a new association and proc_clear_tty but possibly we need
+        * to protect against this anyway.
+        */
        struct task_struct *tsk = current;
 
        disassociate_ctty(0);
@@ -536,7 +540,7 @@ static int tiocgsid(struct tty_struct *tty, struct 
tty_struct *real_tty, pid_t _
        /*
         * (tty == real_tty) is a cheap way of
         * testing if the tty is NOT a master pty.
-       */
+        */
        if (tty == real_tty && current->signal->tty != real_tty)
                return -ENOTTY;
 
-- 
2.8.1

Reply via email to