On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The s390 msgbuf/sembuf/shmbuf header files are all identical to the
>> version from asm-generic.
>>
>> This patch removes the files and replaces
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Heiko Carstens
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> The s390 msgbuf/sembuf/shmbuf header files are all identical to the
>> version from asm-generic.
>>
>> This patch removes the files and replaces them with 'generic-y'
>>
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The s390 msgbuf/sembuf/shmbuf header files are all identical to the
> version from asm-generic.
>
> This patch removes the files and replaces them with 'generic-y'
> statements, to avoid having to modify each copy when we extend
On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 04:37:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> The s390 msgbuf/sembuf/shmbuf header files are all identical to the
> version from asm-generic.
>
> This patch removes the files and replaces them with 'generic-y'
> statements, to avoid having to modify each copy when we extend
The s390 msgbuf/sembuf/shmbuf header files are all identical to the
version from asm-generic.
This patch removes the files and replaces them with 'generic-y'
statements, to avoid having to modify each copy when we extend sysvipc
to deal with 64-bit time_t in 32-bit user space.
Note that unlike
The s390 msgbuf/sembuf/shmbuf header files are all identical to the
version from asm-generic.
This patch removes the files and replaces them with 'generic-y'
statements, to avoid having to modify each copy when we extend sysvipc
to deal with 64-bit time_t in 32-bit user space.
Note that unlike
6 matches
Mail list logo