On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 06/02/18 16:34, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > The DFLL can directly generate a PWM signal to control the regulator IC
> > rather then sending i2c messages. This patch adds support for this mode.
> > In this mode the hardware LUT
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:15:17PM +, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 06/02/18 16:34, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > The DFLL can directly generate a PWM signal to control the regulator IC
> > rather then sending i2c messages. This patch adds support for this mode.
> > In this mode the hardware LUT
On 06/02/18 16:34, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> The DFLL can directly generate a PWM signal to control the regulator IC
> rather then sending i2c messages. This patch adds support for this mode.
> In this mode the hardware LUT is not used and also there is no regulator
> object involved because
On 06/02/18 16:34, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> The DFLL can directly generate a PWM signal to control the regulator IC
> rather then sending i2c messages. This patch adds support for this mode.
> In this mode the hardware LUT is not used and also there is no regulator
> object involved because
The DFLL can directly generate a PWM signal to control the regulator IC
rather then sending i2c messages. This patch adds support for this mode.
In this mode the hardware LUT is not used and also there is no regulator
object involved because there is no way to control the regulator voltage
without
The DFLL can directly generate a PWM signal to control the regulator IC
rather then sending i2c messages. This patch adds support for this mode.
In this mode the hardware LUT is not used and also there is no regulator
object involved because there is no way to control the regulator voltage
without
6 matches
Mail list logo