Re: [PATCH v3 06/16] PM / devfreq: tegra: Drop primary interrupt handler

On 19. 4. 18. 오전 7:29, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: > There is no real need in the primary interrupt handler, hence move > everything to the secondary (threaded) handler. In a result locking > is consistent now and there are no potential races with the interrupt > handler because it is protected with

[PATCH v3 06/16] PM / devfreq: tegra: Drop primary interrupt handler

There is no real need in the primary interrupt handler, hence move everything to the secondary (threaded) handler. In a result locking is consistent now and there are no potential races with the interrupt handler because it is protected with the devfreq's mutex. Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko