On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
> >>> While it is a PPC doc, we
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> Do you think it's feasible to standardise on some interoperable ABI for
> kvm and Xen? This sounds pretty optimistic, but I'm not aware of all
> the technicalities, or what possible third-party hypervisors are out
> there.
>
> If we could do it, it would
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > - hcall-instructions
> > potentially interesting, but given that for Xen we are quite happy with
> > HVC, we are not going to add any
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> >>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
> >>> While
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
> > > While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
While it is a PPC
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
- hcall-instructions
potentially interesting, but given that for Xen we are quite happy with
HVC, we are not going to add any
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote:
Do you think it's feasible to standardise on some interoperable ABI for
kvm and Xen? This sounds pretty optimistic, but I'm not aware of all
the technicalities, or what possible third-party hypervisors are out
there.
If we could do it, it would be
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse
On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
>>> While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense.
>>>
>>>
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> > You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
> > While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense.
> >
> > See section 7.5:
> >
> >
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> > CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
> > CC: David Vrabel
> > ---
> >
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense.
See section 7.5:
On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote:
You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings.
While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what makes sense.
See section 7.5:
On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
> CC: David Vrabel
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++
> 1
On 08/16/2012 10:35 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
---
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
create mode
Add a doc to describe the Xen ARM device tree bindings
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com
CC: devicetree-disc...@lists.ozlabs.org
CC: David Vrabel david.vra...@citrix.com
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/xen.txt | 22 ++
1 files
20 matches
Mail list logo
