Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control variables

On 10/15, Jon Mason wrote: > Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control. The means the > pll_base needs to be split into 2 new variables, so that those PLLs can > specify device tree registers for those independently. Also, add a new > driver flag to identify this presence of the

Re: [PATCH v3 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control variables

On 10/15, Jon Mason wrote: > Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control. The means the > pll_base needs to be split into 2 new variables, so that those PLLs can > specify device tree registers for those independently. Also, add a new > driver flag to identify this presence of the

[PATCH v3 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control variables

Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control. The means the pll_base needs to be split into 2 new variables, so that those PLLs can specify device tree registers for those independently. Also, add a new driver flag to identify this presence of the split, and let the driver know that

[PATCH v3 07/10] clk: iproc: Separate status and control variables

Some PLLs have separate registers for Status and Control. The means the pll_base needs to be split into 2 new variables, so that those PLLs can specify device tree registers for those independently. Also, add a new driver flag to identify this presence of the split, and let the driver know that