Hi Sakari
On 28/12/2020 16:41, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:21:15PM +, Daniel Scally wrote:
>> Hi Andy, Laurent
>>
>>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Laurent Pinchart
>>> wrote:
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:21:15PM +, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Hi Andy, Laurent
>
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Laurent Pinchart
> > wrote:
> >> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
> >
>
Hi Andy
On 24/12/2020 12:24, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
>>
>> From: Heikki Krogerus
>>
>> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
>
> .graph_* ==> ->graph_*() ?
>
>> fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That
On 24/12/2020 12:53, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> +while ((port = software_node_get_next_child(parent, old))) {
>> +/*
>> + * ports have naming style "port@n", so we search for children
>> + * that follow that convention (but without assuming anything
>> +
Hi Andy, Laurent
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Laurent Pinchart
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
>
> ...
>
+ if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port@",
>>>
>>>
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 2:55 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
...
> > > + if (!strncmp(to_swnode(port)->node->name, "port@",
> >
> > You may use here corresponding
Hi Andy,
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 02:24:12PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
> >
> > From: Heikki Krogerus
> >
> > This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
>
> .graph_* ==> ->graph_*() ?
>
> > fwnode operations structure for
Hi Daniel,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 01:09:00AM +, Daniel Scally wrote:
> From: Heikki Krogerus
>
> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
> fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes
> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in
On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 3:14 AM Daniel Scally wrote:
>
> From: Heikki Krogerus
>
> This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
.graph_* ==> ->graph_*() ?
> fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes
> the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also
From: Heikki Krogerus
This implements the remaining .graph_* callbacks in the
fwnode operations structure for the software nodes. That makes
the fwnode_graph*() functions available in the drivers also
when software nodes are used.
The implementation tries to mimic the "OF graph" as much as
10 matches
Mail list logo
