On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> > On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> > >
> > > It looks sensible.
> > >
> > > Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
> > > are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and
On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
It looks sensible.
Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:04:48PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> It looks sensible.
>
> Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
> are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
> percpu_down_read and percpu_up_read use the same piece of
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
> >
> > It looks sensible.
> >
> > Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
> > are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
> > percpu_down_read and
On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
>
> It looks sensible.
>
> Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
> are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
> percpu_down_read and percpu_up_read use the same piece of code (to reduce
> cache
It looks sensible.
Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
percpu_down_read and percpu_up_read use the same piece of code (to reduce
cache footprint).
---
Currently the writer does
It looks sensible.
Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
percpu_down_read and percpu_up_read use the same piece of code (to reduce
cache footprint).
---
Currently the writer does
On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
It looks sensible.
Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
percpu_down_read and percpu_up_read use the same piece of code (to reduce
cache footprint).
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
On 11/07, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
It looks sensible.
Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
percpu_down_read and percpu_up_read use the
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 12:04:48PM -0500, Mikulas Patocka wrote:
It looks sensible.
Here I'm sending an improvement of the patch - I changed it so that there
are not two-level nested functions for the fast path and so that both
percpu_down_read and percpu_up_read use the same piece of code
10 matches
Mail list logo