> Just as what you said, the severity table entry for the "EN" check
> should have been skipped when calling from the CMCI/Poll handler.
> As shown below:
>
>MCESEV(
>NO, "Not enabled",
>EXCP, BITCLR(MCI_STATUS_EN)
>),
Yes - that worked. The
On Tue, 2014-11-11 at 18:44 +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> >> The bank 7 error reported as severity 0 because EN=0 ... so we took no
> >> action for it.
> >
> > How come EN is 0? Bank7 error reporting is not enabled? Why? Or the
> > error injection thing doesn't do it?
>
> The "EN" bit is poorly name
>> The bank 7 error reported as severity 0 because EN=0 ... so we took no
>> action for it.
>
> How come EN is 0? Bank7 error reporting is not enabled? Why? Or the
> error injection thing doesn't do it?
The "EN" bit is poorly named, and not well documented. Here's a clip from the
SDM:
One of b
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 11:32:12PM +, Luck, Tony wrote:
> But then I tested it ...
>
> I injected a UC error to memory - then did a simple byte write to the target
> line.
> This resulted in two banks logging errors:
>
> [ 124.638045] poll: CPU54 saw ec010092 in bank 7
> [ 124.6390
But then I tested it ...
I injected a UC error to memory - then did a simple byte write to the target
line.
This resulted in two banks logging errors:
[ 124.638045] poll: CPU54 saw ec010092 in bank 7
[ 124.639006] poll: severity = 0
[ 124.647333] poll: CPU54 saw b8200179 in ba
On 11/10/2014 4:17 PM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:06:00PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
+ MCESEV(
+ DEFERRED, "Deferred error",
+ NOSER,
MASK(MCI_STATUS_UC|MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED|MCI_STATUS_POISON, MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED)
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 04:06:00PM -0600, Aravind Gopalakrishnan wrote:
> >+MCESEV(
> >+DEFERRED, "Deferred error",
> >+NOSER,
> >MASK(MCI_STATUS_UC|MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED|MCI_STATUS_POISON,
> >MCI_STATUS_DEFERRED)
> > ),
>
> We don't need to have MCI_STATUS_
On 11/7/2014 7:40 PM, Chen Yucong wrote:
Until now, the mce_severity mechanism can only identify the severity
of UCNA error as MCE_KEEP_SEVERITY. Meanwhile, it is not able to filter
out DEFERRED error for ADM platform.
This patch aims to extend the mce_severity mechanism for handling
UCNA/DEFERR
Until now, the mce_severity mechanism can only identify the severity
of UCNA error as MCE_KEEP_SEVERITY. Meanwhile, it is not able to filter
out DEFERRED error for ADM platform.
This patch aims to extend the mce_severity mechanism for handling
UCNA/DEFERRED error. In order to do this, the patch in
9 matches
Mail list logo
