We can find the maintainer's reply that the patch set will be merged.
So let me just do a top-based reply here.
The examples I showed in the previous emails are just examples that could be
used to demonstrate the difficulties on the future ACPICA development that
brought by the hooks.
Since all
On 7/25/2013 10:51 PM, Zheng, Lv wrote:
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.w...@oracle.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 8:04 PM
CC-ing some of the tboot maintainers.
As what I've said, it's up to the others to determine if the patch is OK.
I just need to make my concerns visible in t
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:konrad.w...@oracle.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 8:04 PM
>
> CC-ing some of the tboot maintainers.
> > As what I've said, it's up to the others to determine if the patch is OK.
> > I just need to make my concerns visible in the community. :-)
>
> If I
CC-ing some of the tboot maintainers.
> As what I've said, it's up to the others to determine if the patch is OK.
> I just need to make my concerns visible in the community. :-)
If I understand your concerns you don't want the hook to depend on any
of the bit manipulations the existing code does f
@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:32 AM
> To: Ben Guthro
> Cc: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; Jan Beulich; Rafael J . Wysocki;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> xen-de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [PATC
utek Wilk
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2013 12:32 AM
> To: Ben Guthro
> Cc: Moore, Robert; Zheng, Lv; Jan Beulich; Rafael J . Wysocki;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> xen-de...@lists.xen.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_slee
hanks,
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-----
>>> From: Ben Guthro [mailto:benjamin.gut...@citrix.com]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:23 AM
>>> To: Moore, Robert
>>> Cc: Zheng, Lv; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Jan Beulich; Rafael J . Wysocki;
>
ore, Robert
> > Cc: Zheng, Lv; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Jan Beulich; Rafael J . Wysocki;
> > linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; xen-
> > de...@lists.xen.org
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep hook in
> > reduced hardware sle
On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 11:14:06AM -0400, Ben Guthro wrote:
>
>
> On 07/24/2013 10:38 AM, Moore, Robert wrote:
> > I haven't found a high-level description of "acpi_os_prepare_sleep",
> > perhaps I missed it.
> >
> > Can someone point me to the overall description of this change and why it
> >
t; Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 6:23 AM
>> To: Moore, Robert
>> Cc: Zheng, Lv; Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Jan Beulich; Rafael J . Wysocki;
>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; xen-
>> de...@lists.xen.org
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: Cal
lude/acpi/acpiosxf.h - which, I thought was undesirable, in the
> >>>> impression that I got from Bob Moore, and Rafael Wysocki (though,
> >>>> please correct me on this point, if I have
> >>>> misunderstood)
> >>>>
> >>&
rix.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 5:01 AM
>> To: Zheng, Lv
>> Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Jan Beulich; Rafael J . Wysocki; linux-
>> ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org; xen-
>> de...@lists.xen.org; Moore, Robert
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3]
.@vger.kernel.org; xen-
> de...@lists.xen.org; Moore, Robert
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep hook in
> reduced hardware sleep path
>
>
>
> On 07/24/2013 02:24 AM, Zheng, Lv wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Sorry for the delayed res
p Status Register - WAK_STS (1 bit 7), 15-8 = 7, this
>>> definition is
>> equivalent to Table 4-16.
>>>
>>> Thanks and best regards
>>> -Lv
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
>>>
s and best regards
> > -Lv
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org
> >> [mailto:linux-acpi-ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Ben Guthro
> >> Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2013 10:06 PM
> >> To: Konrad Rzeszutek
r.kernel.org;
xen-de...@lists.xen.org
Cc: Ben Guthro; Moore, Robert
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep hook in reduced
hardware sleep path
In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
reduced hardware sleep support, and the two changes didn't ge
esday, June 26, 2013 10:06 PM
> To: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk; Jan Beulich; Rafaell J . Wysocki;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-a...@vger.kernel.org;
> xen-de...@lists.xen.org
> Cc: Ben Guthro; Moore, Robert
> Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] acpi: Call acpi_os_prepare_sleep
On Wednesday, June 26, 2013 04:45:53 PM Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 26.06.13 at 17:03, Ben Guthro wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > On 26.06.13 at 16:06, Ben Guthro wrote:
> >>> In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
> >>> red
>>> On 26.06.13 at 17:03, Ben Guthro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 26.06.13 at 16:06, Ben Guthro wrote:
>>> In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
>>> reduced hardware sleep support, and the two changes didn't get
>>> synch
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 26.06.13 at 16:06, Ben Guthro wrote:
>> In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
>> reduced hardware sleep support, and the two changes didn't get
>> synchronized: The new code doesn't call the hook functio
>>> On 26.06.13 at 16:06, Ben Guthro wrote:
> In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
> reduced hardware sleep support, and the two changes didn't get
> synchronized: The new code doesn't call the hook function (if so
> requested). Fix this, requiring a parameter to
In version 3.4 acpi_os_prepare_sleep() got introduced in parallel with
reduced hardware sleep support, and the two changes didn't get
synchronized: The new code doesn't call the hook function (if so
requested). Fix this, requiring a parameter to be added to the
hook function to distinguish "extende
22 matches
Mail list logo
