On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 2:02 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Pragnesh Patel (2020-11-11 01:51:17)
> > >+#define RCI_GEMGXLPLLCFG1_CKE_SHIFT 24
> > >+#define PRCI_GEMGXLPLLCFG1_CKE_MASK (0x1 <<
> > >PRCI_GEMGXLPLLCFG1_CKE_SHIFT)
> >
> > Same here, Other than this
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Pragnes
gnesh Patel
> >; a...@eecs.berkeley.edu;
> >mturque...@baylibre.com; Yash Shah ; linux-
> >ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> >ri...@lists.infradead.org
> >Cc: Zong Li
> >Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: sifive: Extract prci core to common base
>
.@vger.kernel.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux-
>ri...@lists.infradead.org
>Cc: Zong Li
>Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] clk: sifive: Extract prci core to common base
>
>Extract common core of prci driver to an independent file, it could allow other
>chips to reuse it. Separate SoCs-de
Extract common core of prci driver to an independent file, it could
allow other chips to reuse it. Separate SoCs-dependent code 'fu540'
from prci core, then we can easily add 'fu740' later.
Almost these changes are code movement. The different is adding the
private data for each SoC use, so it nee
4 matches
Mail list logo