Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-25 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:06 AM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:25:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli > > wrote: > > > > > > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-25 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 9:06 AM Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:25:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli > > wrote: > > > > > > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-25 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:25:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of > > __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in > > drivers/of/fdt.c. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-25 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Oct 25, 2018 at 08:25:04AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > > > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of > > __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in > > drivers/of/fdt.c. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-25 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of > __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in > drivers/of/fdt.c. > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > --- >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-25 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Oct 24, 2018 at 7:17 PM Florian Fainelli wrote: > > ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of > __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in > drivers/of/fdt.c. > > Suggested-by: Rob Herring Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli > --- >

[PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-24 Thread Florian Fainelli
ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in drivers/of/fdt.c. Suggested-by: Rob Herring --- drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c index

[PATCH v3 1/3] of/fdt: Absorb ARM64's __early_init_dt_declare_initrd()

2018-10-24 Thread Florian Fainelli
ARM64 is the only architecture that requires a re-definition of __early_init_dt_declare_initrd(), absorb its custom implemention in drivers/of/fdt.c. Suggested-by: Rob Herring --- drivers/of/fdt.c | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/of/fdt.c b/drivers/of/fdt.c index