Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-02-09 Thread Frank Rowand
On 02/09/17 10:52, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 02/09/17 07:17, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Frank Rowand >>> wrote: Hi Stephen, Sorry I did not get to v1 and v2 in a timely manner. On 0

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-02-09 Thread Stephen Boyd
Quoting Rob Herring (2017-02-09 08:00:05) > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > >> Frank, any more comments on this? If not, I plan to apply this series. > > > > Well, I find that a little annoying, be

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-02-09 Thread Frank Rowand
On 02/09/17 07:17, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Frank Rowand >> wrote: >>> Hi Stephen, >>> >>> Sorry I did not get to v1 and v2 in a timely manner. >>> >>> >>> On 01/23/17 12:48, Stephen Boyd wrote: Platforms

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-02-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 9:35 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >> Frank, any more comments on this? If not, I plan to apply this series. > > Well, I find that a little annoying, because DT has the requirement > that new bindings are p

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-02-09 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> Hi Stephen, >> >> Sorry I did not get to v1 and v2 in a timely manner. >> >> >> On 01/23/17 12:48, Stephen Boyd wrote: >>> Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansio

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-02-09 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Thu, Feb 09, 2017 at 09:17:58AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > Frank, any more comments on this? If not, I plan to apply this series. Well, I find that a little annoying, because DT has the requirement that new bindings are properly documented in Documentation, and it appears that this comes with

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-02-09 Thread Russell King - ARM Linux
On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 12:48:49PM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote: > connector: connector { > #gpio-cells = <2>; > gpio-map = <0 0 &soc_gpio1 1 0>, > <1 0 &soc_gpio2 4 0>, > <2 0 &soc_gpio1 3 0>, >

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-01-24 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 12:36 AM, Frank Rowand wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Sorry I did not get to v1 and v2 in a timely manner. > > > On 01/23/17 12:48, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion >> slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards i

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-01-23 Thread Frank Rowand
Hi Stephen, Sorry I did not get to v1 and v2 in a timely manner. On 01/23/17 12:48, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion > slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards in an > SoC agnostic way. We'd like the DT overlays for the expansi

[PATCH v3 1/3] of: Support parsing phandle argument lists through a nexus node

2017-01-23 Thread Stephen Boyd
Platforms like 96boards have a standardized connector/expansion slot that exposes signals like GPIOs to expansion boards in an SoC agnostic way. We'd like the DT overlays for the expansion boards to be written once without knowledge of the SoC on the other side of the connector. This avoids the uns