Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] video: smscufx: Less checks in ufx_usb_probe() after error detection

2018-03-28 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Sunday, January 07, 2018 05:02:21 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:56:11 +0100 > > Up to four checks could be repeated by the ufx_usb_probe() function > during error handling even if the relevant properties can be

Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] video: smscufx: Less checks in ufx_usb_probe() after error detection

2018-03-28 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Sunday, January 07, 2018 05:02:21 PM SF Markus Elfring wrote: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:56:11 +0100 > > Up to four checks could be repeated by the ufx_usb_probe() function > during error handling even if the relevant properties can be determined > for the involved

[PATCH v3 1/3] video: smscufx: Less checks in ufx_usb_probe() after error detection

2018-01-07 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:56:11 +0100 Up to four checks could be repeated by the ufx_usb_probe() function during error handling even if the relevant properties can be determined for the involved variables before by source code analysis. *

[PATCH v3 1/3] video: smscufx: Less checks in ufx_usb_probe() after error detection

2018-01-07 Thread SF Markus Elfring
From: Markus Elfring Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:56:11 +0100 Up to four checks could be repeated by the ufx_usb_probe() function during error handling even if the relevant properties can be determined for the involved variables before by source code analysis. * Return directly after a call of the