On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 06:57:37PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>> > > This patch adds a new fields to the struct
On Sat, Oct 26, 2013 at 06:57:37PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > > This patch adds a new fields to the struct perf_event.
> > > It is intended to be used to chain even
On Fri, Oct 25, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> > This patch adds a new fields to the struct perf_event.
> > It is intended to be used to chain events which are
> > active (enabled). It helps in the hardware layer
> > for PM
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 02:58:02PM +0200, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> This patch adds a new fields to the struct perf_event.
> It is intended to be used to chain events which are
> active (enabled). It helps in the hardware layer
> for PMU which do not have actual counter restrictions, i.e.,
> free r
This patch adds a new fields to the struct perf_event.
It is intended to be used to chain events which are
active (enabled). It helps in the hardware layer
for PMU which do not have actual counter restrictions, i.e.,
free running read-only counters. Active events are chained
as opposed to being tra
5 matches
Mail list logo