Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-31 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > >> Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: > > Andy do you consider this a regression that needs to go into fixes? I think so. The commit

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-31 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: Andy do you consider this a regression that needs to go into fixes? I.e. is this used in in-tree code and causing problems with v3.10... I'm asking because it creates a mess as the

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-31 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote: Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: Andy do you consider this a regression that needs to go into fixes? I.e. is this used in in-tree code and causing problems with v3.10... I'm asking

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-31 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote: On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote: Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: Andy do you consider this a regression that needs to go into fixes?

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: > > INFO: trying to register non-static key. > the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. > turning off the locking correctness validator. > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not

Re: [PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-30 Thread Linus Walleij
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Andy Shevchenko andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com wrote: Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: INFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID:

[PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-22 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: INFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.10.0-rc2-next-20130521-00028-g09aa9fc #487

[PATCH v3 1/5] gpio-langwell: initialize lock before usage

2013-05-22 Thread Andy Shevchenko
Otherwise we will end up with traceback from LOCKDEP: INFO: trying to register non-static key. the code is fine but needs lockdep annotation. turning off the locking correctness validator. CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.10.0-rc2-next-20130521-00028-g09aa9fc #487