Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins

2016-10-29 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and > allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into > account. > > Fix that. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard

Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins

2016-10-29 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard wrote: > Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and > allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into > account. > > Fix that. > > Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard > Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai Patch

[PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins

2016-10-20 Thread Maxime Ripard
Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into account. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai ---

[PATCH v3 1/6] pinctrl: sunxi: Deal with configless pins

2016-10-20 Thread Maxime Ripard
Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into account. Fix that. Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai --- drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 51