On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and
> allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into
> account.
>
> Fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 3:49 PM, Maxime Ripard
wrote:
> Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and
> allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into
> account.
>
> Fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
Patch
Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and
allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into
account.
Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
---
Even though the our binding had the assumption that the allwinner,pull and
allwinner,drive properties were optional, the code never took that into
account.
Fix that.
Signed-off-by: Maxime Ripard
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai
---
drivers/pinctrl/sunxi/pinctrl-sunxi.c | 51
4 matches
Mail list logo