Hi Nikita,
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 17:00 +0300, nikita.shu...@maquefel.me wrote:
> > I considered your offer of using array with holes.
> >
> > It looks pretty ugly to me, couse it leads to bloated arrays:
> >
> > static unsigned char gpio_int_unmasked[EP93XX_GPIO_CHIP_NUM];
> > static uns
Hi Nikita,
On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 15:55 +0300, nikita.shu...@maquefel.me wrote:
> I considered your offer of using array with holes.
>
> It looks pretty ugly to me, couse it leads to bloated arrays:
>
> static unsigned char gpio_int_unmasked[EP93XX_GPIO_CHIP_NUM];
> static unsigned char gpio_in
Hello Nikita,
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 18:11 +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > +/*
> > + * F Port index in GPIOCHIP'S array is 5
> > + * but we use index 2 for stored values and offsets
> > + */
> > +#define EP93XX_GPIO_F_PORT_INDEX 5
>
> Hmm... Why not to use an array with holes instead.
>
> ...
>
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:21 PM Nikita Shubin wrote:
>
> The port F is index 2 not 5.
>
> [ cut here ]
> kernel BUG at drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c:64!
Perhaps you missed my message, please cut this to have only related
information and not be so noisy!
> Internal error: Oop
The port F is index 2 not 5.
[ cut here ]
kernel BUG at drivers/gpio/gpio-ep93xx.c:64!
Internal error: Oops - BUG: 0 [#1] ARM
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 403 Comm: gpio-event-mon Not tainted
5.9.10-00011-ge93e9618628b-dirty #19
Hardware name: Technologic Systems TS-72xx
5 matches
Mail list logo
