On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 17:00 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 08:21 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 21:12 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Eric Dumazet
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It seems drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c u
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 08:21 -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 21:12 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c uses VM_RESERVED
> >
> > Yeah, I just pushed out what I think is the right
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 21:12 +0900, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> >
> > It seems drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c uses VM_RESERVED
>
> Yeah, I just pushed out what I think is the right (trivial) fix.
Thank you, looks correct to me as well.
Alex
--
To u
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> It seems drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c uses VM_RESERVED
Yeah, I just pushed out what I think is the right (trivial) fix.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
On Tue, 2012-07-31 at 14:42 +0400, Konstantin Khlebnikov wrote:
> A long time ago, in v2.4, VM_RESERVED kept swapout process off VMA,
> currently it lost original meaning but still has some effects:
>
> | effect | alternative flags
> -++
A long time ago, in v2.4, VM_RESERVED kept swapout process off VMA,
currently it lost original meaning but still has some effects:
| effect | alternative flags
-++-
1| account as reserved_vm | VM_IO
2| skip in cor
A long time ago, in v2.4, VM_RESERVED kept swapout process off VMA,
currently it lost original meaning but still has some effects:
| effect | alternative flags
-++-
1| account as reserved_vm | VM_IO
2| skip in cor
7 matches
Mail list logo