On 02/04/2015 05:08 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:21:53PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> At the moment writing new TCE value to the IOMMU table fails with EBUSY
>> if there is a valid entry already. However PAPR specification allows
>> the guest to write new TCE
On 02/04/2015 05:08 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:21:53PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
At the moment writing new TCE value to the IOMMU table fails with EBUSY
if there is a valid entry already. However PAPR specification allows
the guest to write new TCE value
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:21:53PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> At the moment writing new TCE value to the IOMMU table fails with EBUSY
> if there is a valid entry already. However PAPR specification allows
> the guest to write new TCE value without clearing it first.
>
> Another problem
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 08:21:53PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
At the moment writing new TCE value to the IOMMU table fails with EBUSY
if there is a valid entry already. However PAPR specification allows
the guest to write new TCE value without clearing it first.
Another problem this
At the moment writing new TCE value to the IOMMU table fails with EBUSY
if there is a valid entry already. However PAPR specification allows
the guest to write new TCE value without clearing it first.
Another problem this patch is addressing is the use of pool locks for
external IOMMU users such
At the moment writing new TCE value to the IOMMU table fails with EBUSY
if there is a valid entry already. However PAPR specification allows
the guest to write new TCE value without clearing it first.
Another problem this patch is addressing is the use of pool locks for
external IOMMU users such
6 matches
Mail list logo
