Lubomir Rintel writes:
> Use a proper PHY driver, instead of hooks to a board support package.
Hi Lubomir,
This specific patch caught my attention, because of its title : I don't see what
phy-pxa-usb stands for, is it a typo ? I don't think anybody implemented so far
a proper phy support for
Lubomir Rintel writes:
> Use a proper PHY driver, instead of hooks to a board support package.
Hi Lubomir,
This specific patch caught my attention, because of its title : I don't see what
phy-pxa-usb stands for, is it a typo ? I don't think anybody implemented so far
a proper phy support for
Use a proper PHY driver, instead of hooks to a board support package.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel
Tested-by: Pavel Machek
---
arch/arm/mach-mmp/devices.c | 11 +---
drivers/usb/phy/phy-mv-usb.c | 123 ---
drivers/usb/phy/phy-mv-usb.h | 8 ++-
3 files
Use a proper PHY driver, instead of hooks to a board support package.
Signed-off-by: Lubomir Rintel
Tested-by: Pavel Machek
---
arch/arm/mach-mmp/devices.c | 11 +---
drivers/usb/phy/phy-mv-usb.c | 123 ---
drivers/usb/phy/phy-mv-usb.h | 8 ++-
3 files
4 matches
Mail list logo