[PATCH v3 19/21] dyndbg: extend ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional leading filter-flags

2020-06-17 Thread Jim Cromie
Change ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional filterflags before the required operator [-+=]. Read the flags into the filter_flags parameter added in the previous patch. So this now supplies the filterflags to ddebug_exec_query. filterflags work like query terms, they constrain what callsites get

Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] dyndbg: extend ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional leading filter-flags

2020-06-18 Thread jim . cromie
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:44 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > > On Wed 2020-06-17 10:25:34, Jim Cromie wrote: > > Change ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional filterflags before the > > required operator [-+=]. Read the flags into the filter_flags > > parameter added in the previous patch. So this now su

Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] dyndbg: extend ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional leading filter-flags

2020-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
On Thu 2020-06-18 08:54:58, jim.cro...@gmail.com wrote: > On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:44 AM Petr Mladek wrote: > > > > On Wed 2020-06-17 10:25:34, Jim Cromie wrote: > > > Change ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional filterflags before the > > > required operator [-+=]. Read the flags into the filte

Re: [PATCH v3 19/21] dyndbg: extend ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional leading filter-flags

2020-06-18 Thread Petr Mladek
On Wed 2020-06-17 10:25:34, Jim Cromie wrote: > Change ddebug_parse_flags to accept optional filterflags before the > required operator [-+=]. Read the flags into the filter_flags > parameter added in the previous patch. So this now supplies the > filterflags to ddebug_exec_query. > > filterflag