Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: fix display nodes

2021-03-12 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 at 03:10, Bjorn Andersson wrote: > > On Tue 16 Feb 15:14 CST 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > > > Except for the compatible value changes: > > > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov > > > > May I suggest to split the compatibility name changes into a separate > > series from this pa

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: fix display nodes

2021-03-10 Thread Bjorn Andersson
On Tue 16 Feb 15:14 CST 2021, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: > Except for the compatible value changes: > > Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov > > May I suggest to split the compatibility name changes into a separate > series from this patch (without it the patch stands a chance of being > accepted into th

Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: fix display nodes

2021-02-16 Thread Dmitry Baryshkov
Except for the compatible value changes: Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov May I suggest to split the compatibility name changes into a separate series from this patch (without it the patch stands a chance of being accepted into the stable tree, if I'm not mistaken). On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 at 19:27, J

[PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8250: fix display nodes

2021-02-15 Thread Jonathan Marek
Apply these fixes to the newly added sm8250 display ndoes - Use sm8250 compatibles instead of sdm845 compatibles - Remove "notused" interconnect (which apparently was blindly copied from my old patches) - Use dispcc node example from dt-bindings, removing clocks which aren't documented or