Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] scsi: ufs: clear UAC for FFU and RPMB LUNs

2020-10-27 Thread kernel test robot
Hi Jaegeuk, I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve: [auto build test WARNING on scsi/for-next] [also build test WARNING on mkp-scsi/for-next linus/master linux/master v5.10-rc1 next-20201027] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] scsi: ufs: clear UAC for FFU and RPMB LUNs

2020-10-26 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
On 10/26, asuto...@codeaurora.org wrote: > On 2020-10-24 08:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: > > From: Jaegeuk Kim > > > > In order to conduct FFU or RPMB operations, UFS needs to clear UAC. This > > patch > > clears it explicitly, so that we could get no failure given early > > execution. > > > >

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] scsi: ufs: clear UAC for FFU and RPMB LUNs

2020-10-26 Thread asutoshd
On 2020-10-24 08:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote: From: Jaegeuk Kim In order to conduct FFU or RPMB operations, UFS needs to clear UAC. This patch clears it explicitly, so that we could get no failure given early execution. What's the meaning of 'given early execution'? Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk

[PATCH v3 2/5] scsi: ufs: clear UAC for FFU and RPMB LUNs

2020-10-24 Thread Jaegeuk Kim
From: Jaegeuk Kim In order to conduct FFU or RPMB operations, UFS needs to clear UAC. This patch clears it explicitly, so that we could get no failure given early execution. Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim --- drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 70 +++