Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

On 07/01/16 at 05:31pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Am Freitag, 01 Juli 2016, 17:02:23 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann: > > Am Freitag, 01 Juli 2016, 14:36:02 schrieb Dave Young: > > > On 07/01/16 at 02:51pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 17:43:57 schrieb Dave Y

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Freitag, 01 Juli 2016, 17:02:23 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann: > Am Freitag, 01 Juli 2016, 14:36:02 schrieb Dave Young: > > On 07/01/16 at 02:51pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 17:43:57 schrieb Dave Young: > > > > On 06/30/16 at 01:42pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann w

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Freitag, 01 Juli 2016, 14:36:02 schrieb Dave Young: > On 07/01/16 at 02:51pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 17:43:57 schrieb Dave Young: > > > On 06/30/16 at 01:42pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 12:49:44 schrieb Thiago Jung Ba

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

On 07/01/16 at 02:51pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 17:43:57 schrieb Dave Young: > > On 06/30/16 at 01:42pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 12:49:44 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann: > > > > To be honest I think struct kexec_buf is an im

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 17:43:57 schrieb Dave Young: > On 06/30/16 at 01:42pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 12:49:44 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann: > > > To be honest I think struct kexec_buf is an implementation detail > > > inside > > > kexec_locate_mem_hole,

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

On 06/30/16 at 01:42pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 12:49:44 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann: > > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 11:07:00 schrieb Dave Young: > > > On 06/29/16 at 06:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > > I'm not following. The IMA buffer patchset doe

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 12:49:44 schrieb Thiago Jung Bauermann: > Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 11:07:00 schrieb Dave Young: > > On 06/29/16 at 06:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > I'm not following. The IMA buffer patchset doesn't use > > > kexec_locate_mem_hole nor struct kexec_buf. >

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Donnerstag, 30 Juni 2016, 11:07:00 schrieb Dave Young: > On 06/29/16 at 06:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 29 Juni 2016, 15:47:51 schrieb Dave Young: > > > On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > > +/** > > > > + * struct kexec_buf - parameters for finding

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

On 06/29/16 at 06:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 29 Juni 2016, 15:47:51 schrieb Dave Young: > > On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h > > > index e8acb2b43dd9..e16d845d587f 100644 > > > --- a/include/

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Mittwoch, 29 Juni 2016, 15:47:51 schrieb Dave Young: > On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > diff --git a/include/linux/kexec.h b/include/linux/kexec.h > > index e8acb2b43dd9..e16d845d587f 100644 > > --- a/include/linux/kexec.h > > +++ b/include/linux/kexec.h > > @@ -146,7 +14

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

On 06/28/16 at 07:18pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 23 Juni 2016, 10:25:06 schrieb Dave Young: > > On 06/22/16 at 08:30pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > > Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young: > > > > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more specifi

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Donnerstag, 23 Juni 2016, 10:25:06 schrieb Dave Young: > On 06/22/16 at 08:30pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young: > > > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more specific? > > > > > > For example just like the first sentence of t

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

On 06/22/16 at 08:30pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young: > > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more specific? > > > > For example just like the first sentence of the patch descriotion: > > Allow architectures to specify their own m

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Am Mittwoch, 22 Juni 2016, 18:20:47 schrieb Dave Young: > The patch looks good, but could the subject be more specific? > > For example just like the first sentence of the patch descriotion: > Allow architectures to specify their own memory walking function Ok, What about this? I also changed the

Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

The patch looks good, but could the subject be more specific? For example just like the first sentence of the patch descriotion: Allow architectures to specify their own memory walking function On 06/21/16 at 04:48pm, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: > Allow architectures to specify different memory

[PATCH v3 2/9] kexec_file: Generalize kexec_add_buffer.

Allow architectures to specify different memory walking functions for kexec_add_buffer. Intel uses iomem to track reserved memory ranges, but PowerPC uses the memblock subsystem. Signed-off-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann Cc: Eric Biederman Cc: Dave Young Cc: ke...@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kerne