On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > > > > The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM
> > > > > > capture devices. A new clock is required as well as
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > > > > The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM
> > > > > > capture devices. A new clock is required as well as
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed,
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > On Wed,
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:06:35PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > >
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
>
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
>
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> > > be more inline with the naming conventions of the
On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:41:07PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> > > be more inline with the naming conventions of the
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
> > we used to treat each line
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 03:51:52PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
> > we used to treat each line
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
> > we used to treat each line as a channel, the
On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> > be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
> > we used to treat each line as a channel, the
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
> we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to
> describe them as devices.
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:35AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
> be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
> we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to
> describe them as devices.
We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to
describe them as devices.
The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM
We're renaming the 'st,pwm-num-chan' binding to 'st,pwm-num-devs' to
be more inline with the naming conventions of the subsystem. Where
we used to treat each line as a channel, the PWM convention is to
describe them as devices.
The second documentation adaption entails adding support for PWM
18 matches
Mail list logo
