On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 07:08:24AM -0700, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:36:51 +0900
> Byungchul Park wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:44:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12:49AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > > It would be better to
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 19:36:51 +0900
Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:44:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12:49AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > > It would be better to avoid pushing tasks to other cpu within
> > > a SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain, in
On Thu, 23 Mar 2017 18:21:23 +0900
Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12:49AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > It would be better to avoid pushing tasks to other cpu within
> > a SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain, instead, get more chances to check other
> > siblings.
>
> +cc ghask...@n
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:44:45AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12:49AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > It would be better to avoid pushing tasks to other cpu within
> > a SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain, instead, get more chances to check other
> > siblings.
>
> Did you for
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12:49AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> It would be better to avoid pushing tasks to other cpu within
> a SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain, instead, get more chances to check other
> siblings.
Did you forget to post the rt equivalent to patch 1?
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 11:12:49AM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> It would be better to avoid pushing tasks to other cpu within
> a SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain, instead, get more chances to check other
> siblings.
+cc ghask...@novell.com
+cc srost...@redhat.com
>
> Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park
>
It would be better to avoid pushing tasks to other cpu within
a SD_PREFER_SIBLING domain, instead, get more chances to check other
siblings.
Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park
---
kernel/sched/rt.c | 17 +
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/rt.c b/kernel/sched
7 matches
Mail list logo