Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] dgnc: checkpatch: macros in enclosed parantheses

2015-01-14 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:08:33PM +0100, Simone Weiss wrote: > dpacompat.h and digi.h partly define the same macros, so it is necessary to > change them both. > Could we eliminate one define? (I haven't looked so this isn't a rhetorical question). regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe

[PATCH v3 4/6] dgnc: checkpatch: macros in enclosed parantheses

2015-01-14 Thread Simone Weiss
dpacompat.h and digi.h partly define the same macros, so it is necessary to change them both. Signed-off-by: Simone Weiss Signed-off-by: Helene Gsaenger --- drivers/staging/dgnc/digi.h | 58 drivers/staging/dgnc/dpacompat.h | 12 - 2 files

[PATCH v3 4/6] dgnc: checkpatch: macros in enclosed parantheses

2015-01-14 Thread Simone Weiss
dpacompat.h and digi.h partly define the same macros, so it is necessary to change them both. Signed-off-by: Simone Weiss simone.we...@fau.de Signed-off-by: Helene Gsaenger helene.gsaen...@studium.fau.de --- drivers/staging/dgnc/digi.h | 58

Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] dgnc: checkpatch: macros in enclosed parantheses

2015-01-14 Thread Dan Carpenter
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:08:33PM +0100, Simone Weiss wrote: dpacompat.h and digi.h partly define the same macros, so it is necessary to change them both. Could we eliminate one define? (I haven't looked so this isn't a rhetorical question). regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from