On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 06:44:47PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
> As long as the completion is already provided by the SPI core
> then there is no need to waste extra-memory on this.
> Also a waiting function was added to avoid code duplication.
This would need to be split in two patches, one to
On Tue, Apr 03, 2018 at 06:44:47PM +0300, Sergey Suloev wrote:
> As long as the completion is already provided by the SPI core
> then there is no need to waste extra-memory on this.
> Also a waiting function was added to avoid code duplication.
This would need to be split in two patches, one to
As long as the completion is already provided by the SPI core
then there is no need to waste extra-memory on this.
Also a waiting function was added to avoid code duplication.
Changes in v2:
1) Fixed issue with passing an invalid argument into devm_request_irq()
function.
Signed-off-by: Sergey
As long as the completion is already provided by the SPI core
then there is no need to waste extra-memory on this.
Also a waiting function was added to avoid code duplication.
Changes in v2:
1) Fixed issue with passing an invalid argument into devm_request_irq()
function.
Signed-off-by: Sergey
4 matches
Mail list logo