> -Original Message-
> From: linux-edac-ow...@vger.kernel.org On
> Behalf Of Borislav Petkov
> Sent: Tuesday, May 21, 2019 6:09 PM
> To: Luck, Tony
> Cc: Ghannam, Yazen ; linux-e...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; x...@kernel.org
> Subject: Re
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 01:42:40PM -0700, Luck, Tony wrote:
> On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:29:02PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> >
> > Can we do instead:
> >
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank *, mce_banks_array);
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank,
> >
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 10:29:02PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
>
> Can we do instead:
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank *, mce_banks_array);
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU_READ_MOSTLY(struct mce_bank,
> mce_banks_array[MAX_NR_BANKS]);
>
> which should be something like 9*32 =
On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 05:52:42PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> This message comes from ___might_sleep() which checks the
> system_state.
>
> On CPU0, system_state=SYSTEM_BOOTING.
>
> On every other CPU, system_state=SYSTEM_SCHEDULING, and that's the
> only system_state where the message is
> -Original Message-
> From: Borislav Petkov
> Sent: Saturday, May 18, 2019 6:26 AM
> To: Ghannam, Yazen
> Cc: linux-e...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; b...@suse.de;
> tony.l...@intel.com; x...@kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] x86/MCE: Mak
On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 08:32:20PM +, Ghannam, Yazen wrote:
> From: Yazen Ghannam
>
> The number of MCA banks is provided per logical CPU. Historically, this
> number has been the same across all CPUs, but this is not an
> architectural guarantee. Future AMD systems may have MCA bank counts
From: Yazen Ghannam
The number of MCA banks is provided per logical CPU. Historically, this
number has been the same across all CPUs, but this is not an
architectural guarantee. Future AMD systems may have MCA bank counts
that vary between logical CPUs in a system.
This issue was partially
7 matches
Mail list logo
