On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Yinghai: I am trying to understand what exactly is this platform bug
> and how to add a quirk such that this platform remains unaffected. Can
> you please help me by suggesting how to decide if this is _the_
> platform that has the bug (the
Hi Yinghai / Bjorn,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Rajat Jain
>>> > wrote:
>>> > > Hello Bjorn,
>>> > >
>>> > > Just checking on the fate of this patch set...
>>> > >
>>> > > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas
>>>
Hi Yinghai / Bjorn,
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 12:58 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Rajat Jain rajatxj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Bjorn,
Just checking on the fate of this patch set...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 1:30 AM, Rajat Jain rajatxj...@gmail.com wrote:
Yinghai: I am trying to understand what exactly is this platform bug
and how to add a quirk such that this platform remains unaffected. Can
you please help me by suggesting how to decide if this is _the_
platform that has
orn Helgaas; Rajat Jain
>> Cc: Rajat Jain; Kenji Kaneshige; Alex Williamson; Yijing Wang; linux-
>> p...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yinghai Lu; Guenter
>> Roeck; Yinghai Lu
>> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
>>
g Wang; linux-
> p...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yinghai Lu; Guenter
> Roeck; Yinghai Lu
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
> during removal
>
> Hello Bjorn / Yinghai,
>
> > -Original Message-
> &
...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yinghai Lu; Guenter
Roeck; Yinghai Lu
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
during removal
Hello Bjorn / Yinghai,
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
Sent: Monday
: Rajat Jain; Kenji Kaneshige; Alex Williamson; Yijing Wang; linux-
p...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Yinghai Lu; Guenter
Roeck; Yinghai Lu
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
during removal
Hello Bjorn / Yinghai,
-Original Message
el.org; Yinghai Lu; Guenter
> Roeck; Rajat Jain; Yinghai Lu
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
> during removal
>
> On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Rajat Jain
> wrote:
> > Hello Bjorn,
> >
> > Just checking on the fate of
; Guenter
Roeck; Rajat Jain; Yinghai Lu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
during removal
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Rajat Jain rajatxj...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello Bjorn,
Just checking on the fate of this patch set...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:02
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Hello Bjorn,
>
> Just checking on the fate of this patch set...
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> [+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat
On Sun, Jan 5, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Rajat Jain rajatxj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Bjorn,
Just checking on the fate of this patch set...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
[+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013
Hello Bjorn,
Just checking on the fate of this patch set...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
>> We need future link up events for hot-add, thus
Hello Bjorn,
Just checking on the fate of this patch set...
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Bjorn Helgaas bhelg...@google.com wrote:
[+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
We need future link up events for
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Well, in that case I doubt if the patch will solve the problem. I think
> Most likely the "card present / not present" messages may be replaced
> By "link-up / link-down" messages. But I'd appreciate your testing.
I did have a debug patch at
> -Original Message-
> From: yhlu.ker...@gmail.com [mailto:yhlu.ker...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rajat Jain
> wrote:
> >
> > Actually I did not understand the original problem and the solution in
> > the first place (so I also do not understand how
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rajat Jain wrote:
>
> Actually I did not understand the original problem and the solution in the
> first
> place (so I also do not understand how might disabling of presence detect
> notification
> help). If you can give more details on the original problem that
nel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> y...@jasper.es
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
> during removal
>
> On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:20:58AM +, Rajat Jain wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:20:58AM +, Rajat Jain wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
> >
> > [+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
>
> [+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable the link
> >
[+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
> We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable
> the link permanently during device removal. Also, remove the static
> functions that are now left unused.
We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable
the link permanently during device removal. Also, remove the static
functions that are now left unused.
Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck
---
v3: no change, created by splitting the patch v2 [2/4]
v2: (non
We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable
the link permanently during device removal. Also, remove the static
functions that are now left unused.
Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain rajatj...@juniper.net
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck gro...@juniper.net
---
v3: no change, created by
[+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable
the link permanently during device removal. Also, remove the static
functions that are now left unused.
The
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
We need future link up events for hot-add, thus don't disable the link
permanently
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:20:58AM +, Rajat Jain wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems to be Yinghai's preferred email]
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:06:05PM -0800, Rajat Jain wrote:
We need future
@vger.kernel.org;
y...@jasper.es
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] pciehp: Don't disable the link permanently,
during removal
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 03:20:58AM +, Rajat Jain wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Bjorn Helgaas [mailto:bhelg...@google.com]
[+cc ying...@kernel.org (seems
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rajat Jain rajatj...@juniper.net wrote:
Actually I did not understand the original problem and the solution in the
first
place (so I also do not understand how might disabling of presence detect
notification
help). If you can give more details on the
-Original Message-
From: yhlu.ker...@gmail.com [mailto:yhlu.ker...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 7:20 PM, Rajat Jain rajatj...@juniper.net
wrote:
Actually I did not understand the original problem and the solution in
the first place (so I also do not
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:17 PM, Rajat Jain rajatj...@juniper.net wrote:
Well, in that case I doubt if the patch will solve the problem. I think
Most likely the card present / not present messages may be replaced
By link-up / link-down messages. But I'd appreciate your testing.
I did have a
30 matches
Mail list logo
