From: Nadav Amit Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2019 5:59 PM
>
> To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs
> concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. Introduce
> paravirtual versions of flush_tlb_multi() for KVM, Xen and hyper-v (Xen
> and hyper-v are only
On 19.07.19 02:58, Nadav Amit wrote:
To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs
concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. Introduce
paravirtual versions of flush_tlb_multi() for KVM, Xen and hyper-v (Xen
and hyper-v are only compile-tested).
While the
On Mon, Jul 22, 2019 at 07:27:09PM +, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Jul 22, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > But then we can still do something like the below, which doesn't change
> > things and still gets rid of that dual function crud, simplifying
> > smp_call_function_many again.
> On Jul 22, 2019, at 12:14 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> @@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask
>> *cpumask,
>> * doing a speculative memory access.
>> */
>> if (info->freed_tables) {
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 05:58:32PM -0700, Nadav Amit wrote:
> @@ -709,8 +716,9 @@ void native_flush_tlb_others(const struct cpumask
> *cpumask,
>* doing a speculative memory access.
>*/
> if (info->freed_tables) {
> - smp_call_function_many(cpumask,
To improve TLB shootdown performance, flush the remote and local TLBs
concurrently. Introduce flush_tlb_multi() that does so. Introduce
paravirtual versions of flush_tlb_multi() for KVM, Xen and hyper-v (Xen
and hyper-v are only compile-tested).
While the updated smp infrastructure is capable of
6 matches
Mail list logo