Re: [PATCH v3 42/77] ncr5380: Replace READ_OVERRUNS macro with FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUPS

2015-12-21 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 12/22/2015 02:18 AM, Finn Thain wrote: The workarounds for chip errata appear twice, in slightly different forms. One is used when defined(REAL_DMA) || defined(REAL_DMA_POLL), the other when defined(PSEUDO_DMA). In the PDMA case, the workarounds have been made conditional on

[PATCH v3 42/77] ncr5380: Replace READ_OVERRUNS macro with FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUPS

2015-12-21 Thread Finn Thain
The workarounds for chip errata appear twice, in slightly different forms. One is used when defined(REAL_DMA) || defined(REAL_DMA_POLL), the other when defined(PSEUDO_DMA). In the PDMA case, the workarounds have been made conditional on FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUPS. Do the same for the DMA case, to

Re: [PATCH v3 42/77] ncr5380: Replace READ_OVERRUNS macro with FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUPS

2015-12-21 Thread Hannes Reinecke
On 12/22/2015 02:18 AM, Finn Thain wrote: The workarounds for chip errata appear twice, in slightly different forms. One is used when defined(REAL_DMA) || defined(REAL_DMA_POLL), the other when defined(PSEUDO_DMA). In the PDMA case, the workarounds have been made conditional on

[PATCH v3 42/77] ncr5380: Replace READ_OVERRUNS macro with FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUPS

2015-12-21 Thread Finn Thain
The workarounds for chip errata appear twice, in slightly different forms. One is used when defined(REAL_DMA) || defined(REAL_DMA_POLL), the other when defined(PSEUDO_DMA). In the PDMA case, the workarounds have been made conditional on FLAG_NO_DMA_FIXUPS. Do the same for the DMA case, to