On 28/10/2015 at 22:31:48 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> > So you don't care about DT backward compatibility because when a
> > workaround will be needed for one of the IPs, then you will have to
> > update the old dtb to use it.
>
> Nope, DTB does not contain the name for RTC driver
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 19:30, Alim Akhtar pisze:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 10/28/2015 03:18 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>>> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
>>> probably totally unneeded (I missed that
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 18:48, Alexandre Belloni pisze:
> On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
>> probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
>> to make this as a rule...
>>
>>
Hi Alexandre,
On 10/28/2015 03:18 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
to make this as a rule...
On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
> probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
> to make this as a rule...
>
> Since we do not have any data about future workarounds and
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 18:48, Alexandre Belloni pisze:
> On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
>> probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
>> to make this as a rule...
>>
>>
W dniu 28.10.2015 o 19:30, Alim Akhtar pisze:
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On 10/28/2015 03:18 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
>> On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
>>> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
>>> probably totally unneeded (I missed that
On 28/10/2015 at 22:31:48 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> > So you don't care about DT backward compatibility because when a
> > workaround will be needed for one of the IPs, then you will have to
> > update the old dtb to use it.
>
> Nope, DTB does not contain the name for RTC driver
On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
> The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
> probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
> to make this as a rule...
>
> Since we do not have any data about future workarounds and
Hi Alexandre,
On 10/28/2015 03:18 PM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
On 28/10/2015 at 12:31:43 +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote :
The s2mps13 clock driver added new name and compatible... which was
probably totally unneeded (I missed that during review). We don't have
to make this as a rule...
On 10/28/2015 09:01 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28.10.2015 12:14, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hello,
On 10/28/2015 07:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
If that's true, then don't add
On 28.10.2015 12:14, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 10/28/2015 07:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc.
Hello,
On 10/28/2015 07:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc. Re-use.
No new code needed, no changes needed. Keep it simple.
On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc. Re-use.
>> No new code needed, no changes needed. Keep it simple.
>
> Well, it depends - it can be useful to get the
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc. Re-use.
> No new code needed, no changes needed. Keep it simple.
Well, it depends - it can be useful to get the information about it
being a different part into
On 26.10.2015 21:51, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found in s2mps14.
> This patch add required changes to enable s2mps15 rtc timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 14 +-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1
On 26/10/2015 at 18:21:22 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote :
> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found in s2mps14.
> This patch add required changes to enable s2mps15 rtc timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
One really small nitpick below else you can add my
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni
>
On 26/10/2015 at 18:21:22 +0530, Alim Akhtar wrote :
> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found in s2mps14.
> This patch add required changes to enable s2mps15 rtc timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
One really small nitpick below else you can add my
Acked-by:
On 26.10.2015 21:51, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found in s2mps14.
> This patch add required changes to enable s2mps15 rtc timer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
> ---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 14 +-
> 1 file changed, 13
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc. Re-use.
> No new code needed, no changes needed. Keep it simple.
Well, it depends - it can be useful to get the information about it
being a different part into
On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
>> If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc. Re-use.
>> No new code needed, no changes needed. Keep it simple.
>
> Well, it depends - it can be useful to get the
On 28.10.2015 12:14, Alim Akhtar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 10/28/2015 07:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>>
If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc.
Hello,
On 10/28/2015 07:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
If that's true, then don't add new compatibles, new names etc. Re-use.
No new code needed, no changes needed. Keep it simple.
On 10/28/2015 09:01 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28.10.2015 12:14, Alim Akhtar wrote:
Hello,
On 10/28/2015 07:47 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
On 28.10.2015 10:53, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2015 at 10:29:56AM +0900, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
If that's true, then don't add
RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found in s2mps14.
This patch add required changes to enable s2mps15 rtc timer.
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c
RTC found in s2mps15 is almost same as one found in s2mps14.
This patch add required changes to enable s2mps15 rtc timer.
Signed-off-by: Alim Akhtar
---
drivers/rtc/rtc-s5m.c | 14 +-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
26 matches
Mail list logo